UPDATE: “Instead of attacking the judges, the PSOE must find out who got Gallardo and Sánchez’s brother to prevaricate with their plug”
Global Update:
The following report highlights an important international development currently attracting worldwide attention.
The keys Generated with AI Pedro J. Ramírez urges the PSOE to internally investigate the case of prevarication involving Pedro Sánchez’s brother and Miguel Ángel Gallardo. The journalist believes that the President of the Government should be the first interested in clarifying his brother’s alleged involvement in the Badajoz Provincial Council. The ruling declares it proven that the position was created specifically for David Sánchez, although the court applied the principle of ‘in dubio pro reo’ in other crimes. Pedro J. points out that the facts of prevarication are clear and criticizes that the former Extremaduran president Guillermo Fernández Vara could not testify to clarify more details. Pedro J. Ramírez, executive president and director of EL ESPAÑOL, has suggested to the PSOE that it carry out an internal investigation into the case of Pedro Sánchez’s brother, sentenced by the Provincial Court of Badajoz to nine years of disqualification from public office, to clarify the facts that the court has not been able to clarify or prove. “Sánchez and the PSOE, instead of messing with the judges, and if they want to remain clean in the eyes of the public, are the ones who would have the obligation to clarify it. Why don’t they do an internal investigation by calling Miguel Ángel Gallardo and the officials of the Badajoz Provincial Council?” Pedro J. asked during his intervention this Wednesday on the Telecinco program The Critical View. Furthermore, he has considered that the President of the Government “should be the first interested in clarifying why they put his brother in charge.” The journalist has analyzed the sentence against David Sánchez, which declares it proven that a position was created in the Provincial Council “in a spurious manner and lacking real content to be awarded” to him specifically, with a senior management contract. “It is a lenient sentence because overall the accused come out well and because the concept of in dubbio pro reo is rigorously applied when dealing with influence peddling,” he noted. Pedro J. has explained that the court is considering two hypotheses: that someone offered to put pressure on Gallardo or that it was Gallardo himself who favored the musician’s plug to ingratiate himself with Sánchez, after having expressed his support for Susana Díaz. “I know Gallardo and I can’t even imagine him setting up this move to ingratiate himself with Sánchez when he had no aspirations beyond Extremadura politics, then dominated by Guillermo Fernández Vara.”In this sense, he has regretted that the former president of Extremadura, who died last October, was not able to testify at the trial because “he could have clarified some things.”Pedro J. Ramírez has stressed that the “very proven” facts are those that constitute the crime of prevarication: “David Sánchez is not convicted simply for the change of name of the position he had.”In fact, he has pointed out that although the court considers the crime of accepting an illegal appointment to have been prescribed, “what is not What is prescribed is that the content of his obligations be adapted to what was good for him, what he liked, what he felt like.” “Precisely for this reason the third act, also prevaricating, comes later, which is bringing Luis Carrero from Moncloa to Badajoz,” he concluded.
Why This Matters:
The situation could have broader implications for regional stability, international relations, and global markets.
International media coverage is expected to intensify as more updates become available from official sources.
Follow our coverage for more global news and international analysis.
Source: This article was originally published by El Español – Home and adapted for our international English-speaking audience.
Read the original article here.